Understand
Your Customers' Expectations, and You'll Make Satisfied
Customers: A Personal Interview with Steve Goodall
By Cinda Daly
Everyone knows that J.D.
Power and Associates has all the inside skinny on the
automotive industry. However, in recent years, the firm
has expanded to serve a number of other industries as
well: telecommunications, travel and hotels, marine,
utilities, healthcare, homebuilder, consumer
electronics, and financial services. J.D. Power conducts
research and offers consulting and performance
improvement services to help companies improve product
quality and customer satisfaction. Most people would
agree that product quality and customer satisfaction are
inextricably intertwined—but
true success begins with customer expectations.
“All too often, companies
rush to measure the outcome and don’t spend enough time
trying to understand what customers really expect from
the outset,” says Steve Goodall, president of J.D. Power
and Associates. “Companies that consistently deliver
excellent service, and score highly with their customers
year over year, have figured out what their customers
are expecting and deliver to that—or
beyond.”
Steve talks candidly
about customer satisfaction, the primary factors you
need to understand about your customers’ experiences,
and what to do with what you learn about your customers.
Daly. J.D. Power
and Associates has established clear leadership in
market research. People rely on the quality and
consistency of information. They trust it. To what do
you attribute that success?
Goodall. Aside
from good luck, our success comes from three equally
important things. First, we understand and can uncover
the real voice of the customer. Most companies today
have reached the understanding that how customers feel
about their products and services has a real impact on
their success. And, we all know that there is a strong
relationship between word of mouth—both
positive and negative—and
business success. If the customer’s experience isn’t
what the customer expected, the company will have a
tough time garnering repeat or new customers in the
future. If the experience matched expectations, people
are much more inclined to purchase again.
Second, we have a proven
methodology for measuring true customer satisfaction.
And, based upon the public release of some of the
information from our syndicated studies, we can
accelerate understanding and the transparency of the
data so that all constituencies understand how different
companies are performing.
Daly. Most everyone
measures customer satisfaction in one way or another.
What makes the J.D. Power methodology so unique and
effective?
Goodall. Our
methodology has two key features. Most companies rely on
one question or a couple of questions. We inquire about
the full buying experience, asking questions about
various aspects of the product, how the product was
presented, how the product was serviced, about the
perception between the price paid and the value
received.
Then, in the syndicated
studies, we interview customers across the full
competitive set of products or services, focusing on the
unique features. That’s how we are able to rank
products, services, and companies. We use the exact same
methodology and questions for everything. So, if there
are differences in the findings, those differences are
coming from the customers’ perspective, not J.D.
Power’s.
Daly. What are some
universal components of customer satisfaction that led
J. D. Power and Associates to broaden its research
beyond the automotive industry and into other
industries?
Goodall. We
recognized the trend, back in the 90s, when companies
realized that customer satisfaction was actually
important, beyond lip service. At J.D. Power, we already
had quantitative ways of measuring satisfaction that
worked in a balanced scorecard, metrics-focused
management environment, and that applied to many
industries. We refer to the universal components that
impact customer satisfaction as the five Ps: product,
process, people, presentation, and price.
Daly. Let’s break
those down a bit. First, there are those questions about
product quality, features, and functions. Clearly those
vary from industry to industry. What is the universal
angle?
Goodall. It’s
critical to go beyond the product, per se, its features
and functions, and assess the involvement and
satisfaction that the customer has with that product or
service. Examine the other elements that contribute to
the overall impressions that the customer has. Try to
measure that in a quantitative way and in a way that
relates directly to behavior that businesses try to
influence and affect. The key is to understand what
drives behavior.
You get at that
underlying motivation by asking about the process around
the product or service that helps customers, the second
“P."
Daly. What do you
focus on with regard to measuring the people side of
customer satisfaction?
Goodall. Sales and
service people, particularly in the technology world,
play a key role in overall satisfaction. Call centers
have a direct and measurable impact on how a customer
thinks about the product and services. And, even in
today’s online world, people still like the human touch.
Daly. What does
your research indicate in general about how satisfied
customers are with self-support and support service
channels? What is it that customers like or dislike
about these service strategies?
Goodall. The
banking industry has very few customer complaints and
high satisfaction with the automated services for cash
retrieval and basic transactions out of an ATM and
online account review on a Web site. However, the
ability for most customers to go into a branch to talk
to someone about a problem is very reassuring.
Certain types of customer
support can certainly be automated with 24x7 Web access.
The caveat is that the automated support has to be for
very simple, routine functions. When people have
problems, it is very difficult to anticipate all of the
variables, construct a logical way of asking questions,
and give answers that deliver a resolution. Thus, we
have a lot of call centers.
It is accentuated in the
technology industry because, from the customer’s point
of view, most technology is over-engineered. Apple®
and iPod® have put it together so that it
just works. Overall, though, we could easily pick
over-engineered examples from every industry; customers
are looking to manufacturers to make the products easier
and more intuitive. And when it’s not, and customers try
to compensate when they have a problem or try to get
some support from a very sterile help function, the
situation causes angst.
What customers really
want is for someone to get inside their heads to help
them figure it out. “I have technology. I love it, but
I’m frustrated.” Essentially, companies need to invest
the money in in those areas of the people interface
where the product really needs it and invest in the more
routine aspects of support. Use automation for what it
can really do, not for what it can’t do very well.
Daly. Your last
point—product
interface brings us back to the five “Ps” of customer
satisfaction. What do you focus on when it comes to
presentation and price?
Goodall.
Presentation is pretty straight forward. In the case of
a retail environment—Starbucks®
Coffee Shop or Marriott® Hotel Lobby—and
even in the Web world, we ask questions about how the
environment looks and feels; how that environment
presents the product. With price, it comes down to
understanding how the customer feels about
price-to-value. Whether it is a product at the very high
end or one at the very highly discounted low end, we
want to understand if the customers perceive that they
got value from the purchase.
Daly. What best
practice guidance would you offer technology service
providers for surveying and measuring customer
satisfaction?
Goodall. Report
cards and satisfaction rankings in and of themselves are
a “so what.” The purpose of measuring satisfaction is to
understand what action you can take to improve
performance in the future. You have to get more granular
and understand more than the what.
Daly. It follows,
then, that when the report card statistics show up,
someone in the organization needs to contact the
dissatisfied customers and get to the bottom of the
problem. What questions help uncover those things you
need to change to improve customer satisfaction?
Goodall. Without
trying to get to the exact questions, there are three
areas you should focus on. Did the service delivered
match the customer’s expectation? If there was a
difference, positive or negative, how did that
difference make the customer feel? And, finally, why did
those differences make the customer feel that way.
In the customer
satisfaction measurement business, it’s all about the
expectation. Were they met, exceeded, or did they fall
below expectation? Too often, companies rush to measure
the outcome and don’t spend enough time trying to
understand what their customers really expect from the
outset. Companies that consistently deliver excellent
service, and score highly with their customers year over
year, have figured out what their customers are
expecting and deliver to that—or
beyond.
If you don’t know what
you’re shooting for, you can’t measure it. You can
measure efficiency; it’s a good indicator and it is
important. But, what do customers expect? If you deliver
a five-second response and customers expect one in two
seconds, you have a problem.
Once you uncover a
difference, then get at the customer’s state of mind.
How did that difference make them feel? If the service
experience was much better than expected—“I
was delighted”—chances
are that they will tell friends and relatives about the
experience; they may purchase again, and they may pay at
a premium the next time. Conversely, if the customer
didn’t have expectations met and falls into the
“dissatisfied” category, then you will get all of the
negative consequences in return. Customers who believe
they have been mistreated will find a way to retaliate.
Daly. So much
customer feedback falls into the black hole. Or, perhaps
worse, customers with bad experiences don’t ever tell
you they are unhappy.
Goodall. Customers
that don’t provide the negative feedback don’t do so
because they have already given up on the company. It
doesn’t mean that they don’t talk. Our research is
pretty consistent: unhappy customers are a much more
active group. And, it’s no longer just whom you tell at
a party. Customers now have a broader world to reach,
and if they’re so inclined, can start banging away at
the keyboard.
Daly. How can
companies keep the negative spiral from happening?
Goodall. It sounds
trite, but it’s so true. First and foremost, the CEO has
to believe that these customers—the
ones they don’t know about—are
a big issue and pay attention to it. Some of them put
incentives on it. Companies that pay attention to
problems and address this negative customer—and
do it well—want
to know if they have problems before they ever manifest
themselves with the customer and put in systems
internally that identify those beforehand.
Daly. How does a
company reconcile the common disconnect between product
satisfaction and negative customer experiences? Over the
long haul, will product satisfaction win out?
Goodall. If there
is a long-term advantage due to real and/or perceived
superiority with the technology, product satisfaction
will win out in many industries. In the computer and
communications technology worlds, however, those
technical advantages are often temporary. Consequently,
service is a major and distinguishing factor.
A good example of this
has been played out in the satellite TV and cable TV
industry, which J.D. Powers has been measuring for
several years. Cable TV began with a superior product.
The quality of the transmissions was better, and the
service offered a wider range of channel selection.
Then, the satellite providers responded with the triple
play offering: TV, high speed internet, and phone
service through one pipe to the home. So, the technical
advantage, which cable TV had, diminished.
Cable companies are in a
battle to retain their position and market share. They
no longer have the technical superiority; so they have
to learn to do it with service. According to customer
evaluations, the satellite installers are a notch above
where the cable companies were. What used to be purely a
technology play is now more about having the service
technician come to the house, be there on time, have
some ability to create rapport with the customer, and be
technically competent enough to the do work.
Daly. What
industry, across the body of J.D. Power and Associates
research, has the highest overall customer satisfaction?
Goodall. The
automotive industry tends to do pretty well year-in and
year-out. Automobiles are a high customer involvement
category. Cars are one of the most expensive purchases
people make, and expectations are generally higher than
any other product category. For decades, the automotive
industry has understood that to meet or exceed those
expectations, they have to know what those are going in.
Daly. There is
something to be said about the strong emotional aspect
of the car investment, which this industry has played to
very well, particularly in its advertising. What
industry is at the bottom of the barrel?
Goodall. Airlines
and airports are at the bottom, along with some of the
folks in the cable industry. And in some cases,
industries that tend not to have very much competition
and where customer choice is limited find themselves at
the bottom. There is something to be said about the free
enterprise system and competition.
In his keynote speech
“Customer Satisfaction: The Road
to ROI” at
HDI 2007, Steve
Goodall will explore how the shift in power created by
the ability to instantly access both good and bad
reviews of any company’s performance over the Internet
has irrevocably raised the bar of customer expectation.
In this new reality, he will illustrate why investing in
the delivery of customer satisfaction has to be viewed
as a business imperative, not a “nice-to-do”
afterthought.
The Daly
InterviewTM
is a publication of Focus Events, Inc. This interview was
written exclusively for ThinkService, Inc. by HDI 2007
Program Chair, Cinda Daly,
CindaLDaly@windstream.net.
|